From the category archives:

Censorship

IBM and the Web 2.0 World

by Erik on June 24, 2009

in Censorship, IBM, Privacy, Web 2.0

Serendipitously, I just uncovered a post relating to IBM and social media use guidelines, which I wrote about yesterday with regard to the Associated Press’ new policy. IBM’s document is a “public submission to the Department of Homeland Security as part of their Privacy Workshops they hosted in Washington D.C. earlier this week.”

Particularly interesting to my discussion is IBM’s take on what it means to engage your staff in social networking, and how to set the proper expectations with your people:

Both governments and business must adopt such capabilities responsibly and thoughtfully, with proper consideration ofthe risks, governance, and legal issues introduced by Web 2.0. Organizations must implement policies that clarify the boundaries ofappropriate use for participants and take steps to protect proprietary or classified materials.

They must set expectations concerning data ownership, visibility, longevity and privacy. The deliberate and thoughtful establishment and implementation of such policies is an essential step toward making Web 2.0 tools suitable for business and government.

First thoughts: I really think it is great that an organization strives to be forward thinking and embraces new technology as readily as I believe IBM does. It is one of the few firms that relishes in the fact that they have the foresight to stay ahead of emerging trends and to ultimately take action when needed to utilize those trends for business purposes. With that foresight, I also realize that it is important (and essential) for a firm to minimize risk, but it is equally essential for a firm to allow their teams to express themselves and explore their creativity–which allows people to “become a global publisher for free – in minutes” when using Web 2.0 tools.

Social Networking Guidelines

On the same point, I also think a hard line document like the one set out by the AP is a bit of a stretch for acceptable use-policies and the managing directors within the Associated Press should consulted the guidelines set forth in the IBM document posted above. “In the mid 1990s, IBM similarly issued a set of Internet Use Guidelines for employees, while encouraging all employees personally to explore and become expert in the use the Internet.” Use Guidelines like the ones IBM enacted enables innovation and knowledge to grow, while the AP guidelines can be seen as nothing other than a set of rules set out to stifle the creative expression of their workforce.

One of my biggest learns from Adam’s snippet was the shear volume and intensity of the IBM social media platform. Not only does the organization provide guidelines for use of these tools, but the company also actively promotes the technology. IBM says they “did so in order to encourage collaboration and provide greater outside exposure to IBM’s greatest asset – its employees.” That sentence in and of itself speaks to the culture that Big Blue maintains.

Globalization and Sustaining Growth

I also wanted to bring attention to one other snippet that caught my eye on Adam’s site: IBM recognized the opportunity to tap into individuals’ use of social media as a way to flatten a geographically and organizationally dispersed employee population and to encourage more learning, collaboration and development – both inside the company and with external parties. Further, our research indicated that the personal interactions individuals have with IBM employees – online or face-to-face – have a more powerful influence on shaping the individual’s perception of IBM’s brand than any other form of communications, marketing or advertising.

Again, I think the focus on the employee, is partly why IBM hires and retains the top talent from around the world, and maintains industry leader status within the many areas it serves.

Check out what Adam had to say here.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Logo of Facebook
Creative Commons License photo credit: miralize

Wired.com posted an article pointing to a new set of guidelines from the AP regarding a corporate policy about staff posting to twitter and Facebook.

The Associated Press is adopting a stringent social-networking policy for its employees, informing them to police their Facebook profiles “to make sure material posted by others doesn’t violate AP standards.”

The policy (.pdf) comes weeks after an AP reporter was reprimanded for posting a comment to his own Facebook profile criticizing the Sacramento-based newspaper chain McClatchy, whose stock has become nearly worthless after a string of costly acquisitions.

I’m not sure what to think about this one. I think it’s a bit of a concern when an organization that wraps itself in the first amendment tells their staff that they are not allowed to have first amendment rights themselves (as Tony Winton points out in the article).

On the other hand, I believe it is important for employees of large corporations to understand that even in their off time, they are representing these firms, and their written word–whether on facebook or twitter–carries weight for that organization.

Working for another large firm, I know it would be improper to post inappropriate or embarrassing information online that could hurt my firm, and I certainly wouldn’t do so knowingly. The only part that is tricky, is that with these guidelines, it makes AP staff responsible for their “friend’s” postings, even if done so without the knowledge of the staffer.

How can that even be enforced?

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

A California company alleged that an Internet-filtering program being pushed by the Chinese government contains stolen portions of the company’s software.

The company, Solid Oak Software Inc., said it will try to stop PC makers from shipping computers with the software.

Solid Oak said Friday that it found pieces of its CyberSitter filtering software in the Chinese program, including a list of terms to be blocked, instructions for updating the software, and an old news bulletin promoting CyberSitter. Researchers at the University of Michigan who have been studying the Chinese program also said they found components of CyberSitter, including the blacklist of terms. [Via WSJ]

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

BEIJINGChina has issued a sweeping directive requiring all personal computers sold in the country to include sophisticated software that can filter out pornography and other “unhealthy information” from the Internet.

Called “Green Dam” — green being a foil to the yellow smut of pornography — the software is designed to filter out sexually explicit images and words, according to the company that designed it. Computer experts, however, warn that once installed, the software could be directed to block all manner of content or allow the government to monitor Internet use and collect personal information. [From NYTimes]

Wow. Very 1984. I wonder what this means for companies like Apple that have recently opened retail stores in China, and if they plan on staying in this market?

{ Comments on this entry are closed }